Even rocket science can be explained simply.
I delivered the complete copy for the redesigned constellr.com. Every page is now written as strategic content.
Company and product
Constellr is a German deep-tech startup that owns and operates its own thermal satellites in orbit. They deliver the world's most accurate commercially available thermal intelligence — measuring surface temperature from space for clients in agriculture, construction, and climate monitoring. Their rare differentiator: they own the hardware. Most competitors sell roadmaps and promises. Constellr delivers data today.
As demand from government and institutional clients grew, Constellr needed to change orbit. They had agricultural roots — but by the time they came to us, that chapter was behind them. The challenge: help a company with one identity earn trust from buyers who were expecting a different one. And write for two audiences with opposite expectations, without alienating either.
“Government buyers view startups with suspicion. Sometimes it's a dealbreaker. They need proven stability and operational certainty.”
Scope of work
I joined this project at Flying Bisons as lead UX writer and content strategist. The scope covered the full website rebuild — homepage, product pages, use case narratives, about and careers sections. Every word was written as strategic content: backed by competitive research, audience analysis, and a tone of voice framework built specifically for this project.
Domain research
Understanding the domain
I wasn't in every stakeholder meeting — but the recordings were. I went through hours of client conversations to absorb how the Constellr team talked about their own technology: what they emphasised, what they glossed over, what made them visibly proud. That language became source material. Desk research and competitor analysis filled the rest.
Competitor content audit
I audited nearly 20 direct competitors and adjacent players across Earth observation, defence aerospace, and data intelligence platforms. The goal wasn't inspiration — it was mapping the communication landscape Constellr would have to stand out in.
| Company | Model | Sector | Communication style | Tone | Plain? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NASA | B2C / B2G | Space, Earth obs., science | Plain language + storytelling. Reference model for accessible government communication. | Plain Storytelling | Yes |
| ICEYE | B2B / B2G | SAR imagery, defence, disaster response | Technical-military. Precise, jargon-heavy. | Military | No |
| Planet Labs | B2B / B2G | Earth observation, agri, government | Accessible + environmental mission narrative. Closer to storytelling than military. | Storytelling | Partial |
| OroraTech | B2B / B2C | Wildfire detection, thermal satellites | Hero narrative — client as protagonist saving the world from fires. | Storytelling | Partial |
| Vantor ex-Maxar | B2G / B2B | Satellite imagery, defence, intelligence | Corporate-technical, government-grade. Heavy on credentials and capability specs. | Corporate | No |
| Airbus D&S | B2B / B2G | Defence, aerospace, satellites | Corporate-technical. Jargon-heavy, traditional defence communication. | Corporate | No |
| Northrop Grumman | B2G | Defence, space systems | Military-corporate. Very formal, jargon dominates. | Military | No |
| Palantir | B2G / B2B | Data analytics, intelligence | Direct and bold — relatively clean for the government sector. | Military | Partial |
| ASML | B2B | Semiconductor equipment | Communication benchmark: extremely complex technology, increasingly well-explained. | Technical | Partial |
The Jargon Paradox
Why complexity isn't credibility
Every established competitor I analysed used heavy technical language. Not because it helped users understand — but because complexity felt like credibility. The implicit logic: if it sounds difficult, it must be serious.
This assumption has a long history. Military communication was once a model of brevity. Churchill's 1940 brevity memorandum famously demanded shorter documents during wartime. But as Cold War-era technology programmes grew, the language inflated again. NASA-era technical writing became the new default for the entire sector. And it stuck.
Research tells a different story. UK Government's own content studies show that plain language increases perceived expertise, not decreases it. Readers trust what they understand. Jargon signals effort; clarity signals confidence.
direct competitors combined plain language with a government or institutional audience. That gap was Constellr's opportunity — and language could be a differentiator as meaningful as the satellites themselves.
Tone of voice
Defining the voice
I mapped three distinct communication models operating in the space sector: military-style language, plain language (NASA-style), and storytelling. Constellr's leadership chose plain language combined with operational authority — not storytelling, not jargon. Three tone attributes guided everything written.
Military register
Defence-heavy companies mirroring military language. Terse, operational, hierarchy-aware.
Plain language + precision
Government-facing platforms (NASA, UK GOV style). Accessible, task-oriented, built for clarity.
Chosen directionStorytelling / hero narrative
Environmental monitoring companies positioning the client as protagonist saving the planet.
Key writing decisions
Copy in practice
What the Jargon Paradox looks like on the page
The homepage hero is the clearest illustration of the content strategy in action.
Leveraging our proprietary multi-spectral thermal sensing infrastructure and advanced Earth Observation capabilities, our enterprise-grade platform delivers actionable geospatial intelligence for complex operational environments.
Technically accurate. Completely opaque. Indistinguishable from any competitor.
Optical satellites see structures. Radar satellites see through clouds. Our satellites see heat patterns = human activity, infrastructure load, and environmental stress.
Three parallel sentences. Same technical depth. Zero jargon. The "=" translates sensor data into intelligence without losing precision.
Solution
I delivered the complete copy for the redesigned constellr.com — every page written as strategic content, not filler. The tone of voice framework gave the client a replicable voice they could carry beyond the launch. The content-first workflow meant designers had clear, final copy to work with from early in the process — no placeholder text, no late-stage rewrites. The project was contracted as a website copy refresh. It became something closer to a brand repositioning.
Results
No post-launch metrics were shared — the project concluded before measurement data became available. What's documented: strong client satisfaction expressed consistently at stakeholder touchpoints, and a strategic repositioning implemented in full.
Treat this as a collaborative partnership, not a transactional engagement. Flying Bisons brings strong thinking, moves quickly, and will go the extra mile to deliver high-quality results.Conner Reinhardt — Chief of Staff, Constellr
What I learned
In a sector where every player sounds the same, a clear voice can be a competitive asset.
Deep-tech content needs precision of a different kind. The real goal is to remove unnecessary complexity while preserving technical accuracy.
The Jargon Paradox isn't unique to space tech. It appears anywhere expertise is performed rather than demonstrated.
If I repeated this project, I'd surface the strategy gap earlier and make it a formal part of the scope from day one — not something discovered mid-process.
The contract was for website copy. The real deliverable was a strategic repositioning.